Darkening Clouds

There is a storm brewing on the East coast of this country, but unlike the usual storms that gather over the Atlantic and then spiral into the rugged coastline with pounding rain and high winds— this is a political storm –but of potentially equal force and potential damage. It is a perfect storm of deceit and ineptitude, the clouds having been salted by the senior ranks of  the RCMP.  

The eye of this metaphorical storm is over the normally quaint and rural Portapique area of Nova Scotia; now a place in time grounded in infamy as being the centre for the biggest massacre in Canadian history. Twenty-two persons murdered, gunned down, their houses burning around them. All of it seemingly non-sensical, but at the same time carried out with a deliberation characteristic of all mad men. A gun wielding, police obsessed, denturist. Charlie Manson with a banal Canadian  twist. 

The questioning residents of Portapique have since the beginning of that long night in April have been desperate in their need to understand, both on a personal level and on an organizational response level. Their aggravation continues to mount as to the process now underway designed to provide those answers— is failing them. 

The RCMP and the Commission designed to investigate have now become front page headlines in their own right. Lawsuits have been launched against the RCMP by the victim families and despite this raised sensitivity, the Mounties have now managed to put more fuel on the fire of a possible cover-up. 

The response to the 911 calls during the night of April 18, 2020 would and probably should  always be a matter of after the fact examination. No matter how prepared or unprepared any responding agency may have been, the night of terror was clearly unprecedented in scope and human toll. A thorough and concise examination of the response should be undertaken, as painful as that may be, because it is only from that can one learn. Any hope for soothing of the now pointed and partially warranted anger is by necessity predicated on the truth being revealed. Even if that truth hints of negligence. 

With a cursory viewing of the public information now available, there is almost no doubt that the response by the police that night was flawed— whether it be by police action or police inaction, albeit in extremely trying circumstances. So we should expect in any review, to hear the usual combination of malfunctions that are obvious to even the most casual observer in this current RCMP world: inexperienced police officers, a shortage of manpower, miscommunication, and a lack of supervision . 

It is equally likely that hiding behind those officers on the ground and their eventual testimony, will be the RCMP senior executive, likely claiming that the fog of communication hindered them in their duties. 

Sixteen homes and vehicles ablaze, distorted bodies strewn on driveways, scenes that would befit the darkest recesses of a Tolkien novel. The sensory overload of graphic and gruesome detail will form part of the explanation and this will engender some understanding of what the officers were facing. 

Those that have now been assigned to review that night’s operational decisions which were made in minutes and sometimes seconds will be given the luxury of hindsight, after poring over documents in excruciating detail and reviewing and re-reviewing audio. They will then likely pronounce that the police should have gone left not right, that they should have foreseen what was unseeable in the moment. Undoubtedly, they will recommend further training. 

There are two primary and signifigant areas of concern in terms of the response by the RCMP. One is encapsulated in  the history of Gabriel Wortman, the perpetrator who spent years building up an arsenal of guns, imitation police cars and police uniforms. 

Mr. Wortman was convicted in 2002 of assault. In 2010, he was investigated for threatening his parents, who who in turn told the police of his gun collection and advised them of his desire to kill a cop. In 2011 Truro police forwarded a report on the “tip” they had about Wortman, which prompted a visit by the RCMP but no further action. 

In 2013, the most damning information was provided. A couple of retired ex-military personnel got to know Wortman who showed them his illegal weapons and was seeking assistance from them to obtain more. They were also aware of his abusive relationship with his girlfriend. They reported it to the police, who told them they would “check on it”…and then added that there was “probably nothing we can do”. 

Did the police “write off” the files rather than conducting a full and complete investigation? If they did, the real squirming will begin then and any explanation will likely be completely unsatisfactory to anyone listening.

The second area of major concern which has already caught the public attention in full glare is the fact that no warning was disseminated through any in place public warning system, in particular one which could have gone out over everyone’s cellphones. Instead the RCMP “tweeted” 10 times throughout the night and they have already stated relied on local media to pick up their “tweets”. In addition, the information they provided was sparse and only hinted at a “firearms” complaint. Would a better warning system saved lives? No one will ever know for sure. 

The seemingly always defensive senior Mounties of Nova Scotia have been maintaining that they did not have enough satisfactory information on the suspect until the next morning, long after many people had lost their lives. 

Well, guess what? They were lying and have now been proven to be lying. The small satirical magazine operating in the Atlantic area “Frank” magazine, in a report by Paul Palango, has managed to obtain three 911 calls from that evening where the RCMP was told that the suspect was  a “denturist” in the area, that he was “driving a police car” and they provided his name. Two of the three 911 callers were minutes later killed. The third caller was a 12 year old boy, who survived. His call is gut wrenching but he was in control, some say better than the dispatcher who handled the call.

It would be 8 hours later that the RCMP would finally identify the suspect Wortman by name and that he was driving an imitation police car. 

When the story in Frank magazine began to surface the RCMP doubled down —saying that they didn’t have “enough” information to make an announcement.

Frank magazine being a small player and having “scooped” all the major media outlets in Canada, knew that they would be questioned as to the leak authenticity; so they actually produced the 911 tapes, in all their gruesome detail. All the major media outlets, their noses clearly out of joint on this scoop, criticized Frank for publishing the audio calls, none initially went after the fact that it was proving that the RCMP had been lying throughout. 

With no escape possible now from their story what did the H Division RCMP do? They actually sent out an internal memo to the members of their Division that they should “refrain” from “reviewing the article or its recordings as they are sensitive and could be triggering”. They were in the process of “actioning wellness resources” for all those Mounties who now have been exposed to hearing the tapes. 

It gets worse, Assistant Commissioner Lee Bergerman in charge of H Division, issued a statement that they will be “investigating the source of the recordings” and any “related offences” that “may have occurred  with respect to unauthorized release, possession and subsequent publishing”.  The reporter Paul Palango is no novice, as he is a former reporter for the Globe and Mail and MacLeans magazine. It is likely that he will be prepared for this shoot the messenger attitude of the RCMP. 

So that we understand fully. Faced with their lies, the RCMP reaction is to give the H Division members a group hug –and then vow to go after the reporter and his source.  

Along comes the illustrious Mass Casualty Commission. (Its very name should give you a hint where the focus of this Commission is aimed) condemned the media report by Frank magazine because of the damage it would do to the victims. Again, no mention of what the story was actually exposing. 

This Commission has been tainted from the start. Originally the Nova Scotia Justice Minister, Mark Furey, a former RCMP officer, wanted to have an “Independent Panel Review”. After a public outcry by the families of the victims there was  a reluctant agreement to form a joint Federal Provincial public inquiry. 

The Commission is headed by former Supreme Court Justice J. Michael MacDonald, and he is joined by seven women Commissioners. The head of “investigations” is Barbara McLean a former deputy with Toronto Police Service who has been lauded by theToronto Police Service for her “significant outreach to the LGBTQ community”.  The other Commissioners are in charge of things like Mental Health and Community outreach. 

If you lean to any kind of conspiracy theories, it would be very easy to argue that the overall aim of this Commission and the RCMP is to thwart any raw truth telling. This group seems designed to focus on the victims, the laying of wreaths and apologies, not on the suspect and the police response. After all, according to H Division, all the cops are victims too. 

This Commission is not due to report until November 2022, again, maybe by design, it will likely be after any  Federal Election and Portapique is a fading memory in this limited attention span nation. 

Wait, there is more,. 

There is little doubt that there is a couple of genes missing in the DNA of those anointed as white -shirted Mounties. In their lifelong pursuit of patronage and “double dipping” retirement opportunities they have become blind to possible conflicts of interest which may arise from it. It comes of course, from never having to answer to or be measured by outcome.

So now, they find themselves once again in front of the media scrambling to answer how the spouses of RCMP H Division Commanding Officer Lee Bergerman, and Halifax RCMP Commander Janis Grey are working for the RCMP— and had been now seconded to the Commission as investigators. Bergerman and Grey are two senior officers who will likely be front and centre for accountability in the Portapique incident. By their relationships they will have insider knowledge of anything coming out of the Commission investigation. 

Bergerman’s husband, is once retired Mike Butcher, who follows Bergerman to Halifax, nicely gets hired into a contract for the RCMP, and then they assign him to assist with the Commission.

Janis Grey’s husband is C/Supt John Robin. You remember him, he was in charge of IHIT, when  the Surrey Six file was in full swing. It was under his leadership that officers Attew and Brassington were allowed to party and have sexual relationships in Montreal with the gangster girlfriends. Well Mr. Robin shortly thereafter left IHIT, arrived in Ottawa with his wife Grey and then followed her to her last promotion to in charge of Halifax RCMP. He too was then seconded to the Commission. 

All these officers mentioned are known to this writer. It is difficult for me personally to find fault with their credibility as investigators or their capabilities, but they are missing that vital gene which most people have. They are so wrapped in the RCMP sense of entitlement and have been recipients of the RCMP largesse for so long that they can’t even see the problem. 

All of these officers, if they wish to retain an ounce of credibility should step aside or take a leave of absence until this Commission is underway and completes its work. Their very presence and their actions to date demands that they try and restore this inquiry to some level of credibility. They owe it to the survivors and their families. 

Meanwhile the RCMP and Ottawa will try to weather the  heavily buffeting of the narrative which will be coming from the commission witnesses. They will ask for forgiveness. They will claim that they will and can do better. They will also claim that they have already implemented the recommendations of the eventual report. 

The RCMP have become professional apostles of apology and proponents of the theory that everyone is a victim– even them.

They will in the end have to paper over the pending lawsuits with non-disclosure agreements and cash.  Avoid further scrutiny but keep telling the victims that they mourn for their loss. 

The biggest casualty for the Mass Casualty Commission, in the end, may be the actual truth about what happened. 

Photo Courtesy of Flckr Commons by Groupka -Some Rights Reserved

10 thoughts on “Darkening Clouds

  1. Well written. It is unfortunate that the first response of the Force, again, is to cover up, and then look carefully at what can’t be covered, followed by spinning the remaining information. I would love to be on this commission, not to be vindictive but rather to expose the truth. Unless shortcomings are identified, admitted to, and addressed, change will not be forthcoming..

    Like

  2. One detail that seems to have been lost in the brouhaha is that a certain white shirt who was on call to authorize any alert was not answering her phone. I have been watching the releases and news reports closely and have not seen that little factoid yet. Could the brass be conveniently leaving that little gem out? It would explain a lot, including not wanting to throw someone who deserves it under the proverbial bus.

    Like

  3. Thank you for sharing your knowledge and observations. Paul Palango was told early on by an unnamed source that the deaths of the 22 plus one unborn baby pale in comparison to the truth.

    What could actually be more insidious than this horrific massacre – rot at the top of RCMP/government, organized crime, OMCs, cartels, human, drug and/or gun trafficking? There is obviously complicity amongst several levels and groups for this cover up to continue unchecked.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. This is such a gut-wrenching tragedy, rates right up there with Mayerthorpe. Its so easy to criticize after the fact, good old 20/20 is definitely hindsight, but I have to comment on the audio from the 911 operators. I couldn’t stop cringing at the poor execution and process of the information that was being received from those children hiding for their safety, witnessing their mother being killed and having the bravery to be where they were, calling 911 and all the operator could seem to focus on was the fire at the house. It was like she (I think) couldn’t seem to grasp the severity as to the safety of these kids and kept repeating questions about the fire. The children also provided some vital information in regards to the killer posing as police and the replica RCMP vehicle he was using. It appeared to me that the operator minimized and dismissed these crucial facts.
    I also noted that this killer (I don’t like to give them a name as they are far from that privilege) seemed to ‘slip through the cracks’ much like the Mayerthorpe killer. Time and time again our justice system is given pre-incident indicators of violent offenders and their escalation of criminal activity yet the system is so soft and huggy to repeatedly ignore those obvious indicators and they are ‘set free’ time and time again to continue their path of mayhem and murder. I realize our judicial system doesn’t allow for ‘potential’ crimes it only is to serve for those committed, but it is those that have been committed which have been wittled down to a plea and minimized of their severity and the consequences of their likely long term outcome. Its like if the flags fly any higher or the bells any louder it would mean we are all blind and deaf.
    I also can’t help but fault that ‘girlfriend’ … she seems to be the perpetual victim of this killer and has acquired some very disturbing information over the months/years leading up to the killers spree but failed to report or share that with police. I would suggest her guilt and conscious should keep her from living a full and peaceful life.
    And in my opinion, inquiries are a waste of resources and money. They have absolutely no accountability or correctness that would serve the public in any way, window dressing, appeasing the damaged is all it does. As for investigations from the higher ranks, they’re so busy covering their own butts with redaction and shredding that that too ranks right up there with SNC Lavalin, WE, etc. Need I say more?

    Liked by 1 person

  5. It always amazes me just how much speculation gets put out there as fact. Much of this article is based on misinformed or misunderstood information and yes, a lot of the blame for that rests with the lack of timely info from the force. One day the “silent force” will realize the current communication strategy does not work. All that to say the full truth whether it be good or bad will come out through the Commission and nowhere else.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. An excellent opinion piece from from someone who knows how the RCMP operates..

    May I suggest you check out the Halifax Examiner for some interesting articles on the Portapique shootings.
    As an aside.
    I was visiting Nova Scotia from Vancouver and dropped into Portapique 2 weeks before the shootings to check out a local Art Galley directly across from where the fires/murders occurred.
    Bizarre coincidence to say the least.
    How that unfolded in a peaceful, country setting is surreal.

    As for the time line of eventsand conflicting messages, etc.
    There were many other incidences that were either ignored or covered up by the media / police at the time.
    Specifically a “shootout” between a officer in uniform sitting parked in his marked patrol car and two other officers that pulled in and thought he was Wortman and opened fire.
    All this happened in front of a local volunteer firehall in the tiny village of Debert.
    The officers stopped shooting when the officer in the marked cruiser used his loud hailer to yell at them to get them to stop since his radio communications to dispatch were on a different frequency than the other officers and confusion, obviously, reigned.

    The firehall was riddled with shots. No one, miraculously, was injured.

    Many many Nova Scotians are very very angry with how this all went down.
    I’m not sure anyone will be satisfied with the conclusions of a Commission that seems flawed and or biased before it even gets out of the gate.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s