Good-bye to Commissioner Lucki?

It has been widely rumoured, keep in mind, one knows what an Ottawa rumour is worth, that RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki is headed to retirement in June 2022. Let’s say from the outset, I do not know Ms. Lucki personally, have never even seen her in a public forum, so on a personal level one can only wish her a the best in her retirement after a lengthy period of service.

As an interested observer from afar however, or as simply a member of the general public, the time seems appropriate to evaluate her time on the Mountie throne.

In terms of our ability to measure her time and effectiveness, she did not leave us much to go on.

Ms. Lucki was “the leader the Mounties needed” according to Justin Trudeau in 2018; who he judged to be the “absolutely best person for the job, who just happens to be a woman”. The fact that he needed to add “happens to be a woman” is clearly a glimpse in to what Mr. Trudeau saw a pre-requisite for this job.

She was heralded as the 1st “permanent” woman to head the RCMP, her predecessor Bev Busson only being around for a short time in her “temporary” position. (Long enough clearly though to score sufficient points for an eventual Senate seat.)

In 2018 the decade of women advancement in policing was in full bloom much like in all the other government departments across the country. Women were reaching new heights in terms of leadership roles across the organization and at an unprecedented speed. They were in effect being “over-represented” in order for an organization to progress and just as importantly to at the very least be deemed progressive.

In her acceptance of the post as the 24th Commissioner, Lucki outlined her primary plans for “bolstering diversity”and “reconciliation with indigenous persons”. She pointed to her previous successes with the First Nations of northern Manitoba. The speech could have and may have been written by Gerald Butts. No real mention of the brewing problems of contract policing or the upcoming possible unionization of the membership. She, unlike most of her predecessors was a one dimensional candidate, with a singular approach to what ailed the Mounties. Diversity and inclusion would be from the beginning to the end her single mantra.

Her background reflected an insular policing career–in the Peace keeping program in Ottawa, as the head of Depot training centre in Regina, as part of the United Nations protection force in Yugoslavia. None of these positions pointed to a larger understanding of Federal or Provincial policing, the true fundamental core of the RCMP.

The problem of course, like many Federal employees is that Lucki was a liberal in speech only, in knowing the right things to say and where to say them as opposed to knowing the machinations that would be needed to carry out any re-conditioning. She was playing the game of “representation” and “diversity”, without really knowing how she was going to accomplish this, or fully appreciating that the Force that extended past Ottawa didn’t share the same level of concern. Secondly, decades of processes and ingrained cultural history were simply not going to be won over from the confines of a committee room in Ottawa.

In essence she was pulled up by the language of the Woke, then got entangled in the spider-web language of the Woke. Her credence and her dilemma began to unravel once she came under the Liberal magnifying glass of the truly Woke of Ottawa. She aptly demonstrated her conundrum a mere two years later when she flip-flopped on the term “systemic racism”.

She also quickly learned that the Indigenous leadership in this country will turn on you very quickly– should you dare to question their “truth”. Her award for building relationships in Manitoba was as flimsy as the paper on which it was written when confronted by the dialogue of the Indigenous victim. She was caught between knowing that in fact, in the policing world, there is little evidence if any of “systemic racism” by its true definition and on the other side was what she needed to say to appease. She floundered. She knew that if she stated her truth she would have been in full conflict with the people who put her there.

So twenty-four hours later desperate to be on the side of the righteous left, she became a convert, and admitted to “systemic racism”. Unfortunately, she was then asked for examples to prove her conversion and once again, she became the proverbial fish out of water. The example she felt that bolstered her new claim of “systemic racism” was the “height” requirements for Mounties. When someone pointed out that this was more likely “discrimination” rather than “racism” she bumbled once again. The next day, Bill Blair had to come to her rescue and do damage control.

So a mere two years after her start, Perry Bellegarde the Assembly of First Nations Chiefs called for her “resignation”. Apparently her “strong focus on advancing Indigenous reconciliation” had failed– the Indigenous now not wanting to “reconcile” with the Commissioner.

She kept trying though. When asked during an interview as a leader of the RCMP what was the toughest decision she faced, she confusingly answered that it was listening to the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls inquiry testimony. Her need to appease clearly had overwhelmed her ability to even understand the concept of what constitutes a “decision”.

It may have became clear early on to the Liberals, that it may be best if she remained silent and in the background.

Suffice to say that for the last couple of years, we have never had a quieter Commissioner. We went from the somewhat bombastic Paulson to the uncomfortable introvert.

Even when the Force was chastised or lambasted for its lack of leadership, she remained quiet, seemingly unable or incapable to defend. Recently the Information Commissioner of Canada said that “the RCMP is failing in terms of its obligation to ensure Canadians have access to information about its operation and decision making…” that this “lack of action on the part of the RCMP leadership” had been going on for too long.

When a human rights watchdog agency had its requests ignored about the “spying on Indigenous and climate activists” it led to “inexcusable delays” and they accused Lucki of simply ignoring the matter. So the Commissioner who had promised to a program of “listening and learning” wasn’t listening and had not learned that one needs to get ahead of issues. The ongoing examination of the incident in Portapique, is looking like another embarrassment of riches in terms of failures to get things done, at least on a broader level.

Under Lucki, the organization has continued to be inert, unable to act or react, weighed down by a suffocating bureaucracy.

This would have been a difficult time for any Commissioner, it would have taken an extremely strong leader to counter the accepted narrative. Commissioner Lucki clearly did not have that capability. One would have had to at times embarrass the Liberals, stand up to ridiculous assertions, outline the resourcing and staffing difficulties, and point to the failings as well as the successes. She did not or could not do that.

We should also remember that Ms. Lucki was picked by a large panel of seven individuals headed by former Premier of New Brunswick Frank McKenna. How is it that this crew could have felt in those tentative times, that Ms. Lucki was the best choice from across Canada?

One wonders that if there was a Walk of Fame for former Commissioners built outside Leikin Drive –who would get a star or a set of spurs in concrete. Maybe Paulson, if infamy is important, for his crocodile tears on settling the sexual harassment suit and paying out millions of dollars. It was at the very least a memorable media moment.

Elliott who ran into the wall of Mountie intransigence and was apparently given to throwing papers around. Not likely. But then again his intemperance may have been earned.

Zaccardelli who was forced to resign by Harper over the Maher Arar incident for not quite telling the full truth about the RCMP involvement. Again, not likely.

Busson will probably get one after all, she was the first ‘woman” to accept the post, at least temporarily.

One wonders for the next round of Commissioner applications if we are we still in the age of firsts– first woman, first black, first Indigenous, first LGBTQ member? One can only hope that in the next selection for Commissioner we have run out of “first” as being a qualification.

So who will that next Commissioner be? There is another rumour that it may be the current Acting Executive Director of Strategic Policy and Planning Directorate, Alison Whelan. Apparently she is good friends of Lucki, but I am not so sure that Lucki’s pick will carry much weight.

Ms. Whelan is a policy wonk and a long term civilian civil servant in the RCMP. She joined the Federal government as a policy analyst in 2003, then into the RCMP in 2013 to “manage policy development” and to provide “analysis on national security, serious and organized crime.” In 2018 she moved over to National Security and Protective policy. She has a Masters in Political Science from Memorial University in Newfoundland and is co-chair of a task force to create National Hate Crimes Policy Standards as well as an executive director of the Canadian Race Relations Foundation. Policy, is clearly her noteworthy strength, policy is central to her being, but is the policy bureaucracy of Ottawa the place where we should be looking for change, understanding, and leadership? Would a “civilian” leader be the right choice at this time?

(On the off chance you want to learn more of Ms Whelan– she will participate in a “fireside chat” on May 4th, 2022 at the Law of Policing Conference.)

There have been a long list of Commissioners over they years, none of who’s names usually spring quickly to mind.

Remember Malcolm Lindsay in 1969, after all we named a boat after him.

There was William Higgitt in 1973– we also named a boat after him. He was followed by Nadon in 1977, and yes we named a boat after him as well. Simmonds and Inkster soon followed and we named boats after them. You would have thought we were building a navy.

Nevertheless, as we say bon voyage to Ms. Lucki maybe a new boat is in order or, at least maybe a small raft as she sails into retirement. Maybe, if we built a big raft, we could put the real root of the problem, Mr Trudeau, on the raft with her.

Photo Courtesy of Flickr Commons via Benito Condemi de Flice – Some Rights Reserved

14 thoughts on “Good-bye to Commissioner Lucki?

  1. Lucki in Lipstick! Good riddance, you couldn’t even get ‘lip service’ right, let alone, lead the RCMP…god forbid Trudeau finds you worthy of a Senate position!

    God Help the RCMP if yet another bungling civilian is placed in this position…between Trudeau making Canada the laughing stock of the world… Lucki’s legacy was making the ICONIC, respected RCMP, nothing more than a DISRESPECTED Force to be reckoned with!

    Don’t let the door hit ya in the arse on your way out!


    1. Very unfair to be commenting in this manner regarding Comm. Lucki as she decides to retire. Under the circumstances and the difficulties of our times, it would be a tough job, especially where so much of the unknown have surfaced in the past 4-5 years. The main issue is policing in general, and the Force being expected to do more with much less. Congratulations Commissioner Lucki and enjoy the rest of your life, because it’s been a dam tough 4 years. Hopefully there are folks out there that know how the system works, and the lack of funding to get the job done through the Force. LACK OF GOVERNMENT FUNDING. Also! Governments love the blame game, love to deflect blame away from the decision makers in Govt. that held the Force hostage for years. In my day, management, meaning the Officer Core ate their own based on their whim. When they need your help, you better help. When you need theirs, forget it, it won’t happen.


  2. Whoever is being considered, should not only be the best qualified, but look, act, present, and truly feel the need to make Canada a better place, without allowing any special interest group to influence the laws of our country. This can only happen if the politics stay out of the selection process.


  3. The primary goal of the RCMP in recent years has been the demonstration of diversity and inclusiveness in hiring and in promotion. This has also occurred in other government and private
    agencies. Immediately, the Force needs to prioritize and concentrate on what police members and
    departments were hired and paid by Canadians to do. Protect our citizens and their property and
    help them believe that they are safe. Nothing can be gained by condemning Commissioner Lucki nor any previous leader. Get back to work and promote leaders that have proven service protecting our
    people and our communities.


  4. It is a hard job and it takes a special person to head the force, the good candidates turn it down as they realize there are to many problems for one person to solve, may be there should be 2 Commissioners appointed this time, one to handle the Administration and the other Operations. Then we might get results that satisfy a few more people


  5. Robert Paulson called the job of Commissioner “Soul Destroying”, especially since Commish holds the title of Deputy Minister and is part of the government. He/she does what he/she is told. He/she has no independence. Many critical decisions to save the Force, e.g. vacating muny/prov contracts have been left to fester. Pols fear losing votes on prairies and maritimes if RCMP leaves, so the Force is left to fumble and flounder with inadequate human resources to do four levels of policing. There is little or no interest in saving a great Canadian Icon that once garnered respect all over the world.


    1. Well said Ian, There is going to be a lot of frustration and hate going on on here. This is hardly the platform. The Force needs to not have to be dictated to by Governments. They need autonomy, full autonomy. Also, for years the Firce has been under funded, and members are being taxed to the limit. No wonder mistakes are made. The blame should start with those in Governments that hold the purse strings. Crime from Coast to Coast ha gone rampant in the last 59 years. Canada was once a very nice place to be a Police Officer.


  6. Wow. I am surprised at the amount of attention this is getting. Lets just relax and move on. Im sure we all had bad days and postings.


    1. There is no such thing as a bad day or posting. Each one is carried out with the attention it deserves at the time and doing the best you can do. Make the best of any circumstance and life will go on with very little need for complaint or regrets. No regrets of never being asked to be the Commissioner.


  7. Too funny. Once I got up off the floor from laughter I couldn’t help but wonder what was the ‘symbol’ or rationale for naming a boat after the exiting Commissioners? Then I got an epiphany, ah, is it to reference the Captain going down with the ship? Just saying. While my 25 year stint with the federal Gov’t wasn’t with the RCMP I can surely relate to the incompetent wanna-be’s who were assigned the ‘top job’ so to speak. I did a short 3 year Auxiliary in the early 90’s while employed with Corrections, thinking I MIGHT want to cross over someday, but I was taught well and my eyes were opened early and I abandoned that avenue shortly thereafter.

    Upon my first introduction to employment our uniforms were the military-green attire, I used to tell my colleagues that I was as green as the uniform, so please teach me the ‘real’ ropes of the job. From the very beginning the CSC Commissioner was Ole Inkstrup, some hug-a-thug from another country who never worked a day in his life on the front line or visited one for that matter and was going to introduce ‘policy’ on just how to ‘reintegrate criminals into society, to become productive, contributory citizens” I was as green (sick) as the uniform after having been fed that utter rubbish. While my path crossed many times with the RCMP I can honestly feel we were in the same warp-speed toward abyss as fast as our ‘leaders’ could take us, all of which dare I say, were as useless as a “t” on a boar! Never known there to be such thing as merit in the federal Gov’t. Nepotism is the norm. Its not What you Know, but Who you Know, has been, is, and always probably will be. Thats what happens when the Gov’t operates any form of business. I used to get teased by the rookies whom I had 10+ years or better seniority and they would always ask me why I’m not inspired to move-up the ladder. My reply was unwavering, I joined to do security, its what I like, besides my position should tell you that I’ve never screwed up because its only those who screw-up — move up, in my experience or perhaps “know” someone that put in a good word for them no matter how useless they were. I can’t say all the local leaders were nitwits, occasionally we’d get an awesome boss who had worked the line for many years, had great experience to share and was great to work for, but it wasn’t long before the go-getters didn’t like that these ones got the upmost respect and loyalty from his troops and he was soon taken from our midst and vanished. I’m glad to be out and long retired because now, you couldn’t pay me enough to do either job.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s